MSLD 511 - Module 4 - Locus of Control - Madeline Campbell


This week my class and I learned about the Path-Goal Theory, which boils down to how a leader motivates his/her followers to achieve goals (Northouse, 2016, p. 115). Within our studies, it reveals that there are numerous ways to lead and motivate others, and often it can simply depend on the situation. I completed the Rotter’s Locus of Control Scale Test, which measures expectancy of internal or external control for reinforcement. The test results revealed that my locus of control is internal. As Rebecca Vandegrift and Jonathan Matusitz defined in their article, Path-Goal Theory: A successful Columbia Records Story (2011), “Locus of Control is a psychological term that refers to a person’s personal belief on what causes good or bad. An internal locus of control means they openly take responsibility for their wrongs” (p. 353).

First and foremost, I fully agree with the results as I subscribe to the belief that individuals should always take responsibility for their actions. Only I can control how I act and how I respond to different situations. If I make mistakes within my work, then I accept them as my own fault as I was the one responsible for seeing that task through to completion. If I become an unhealthy weight (and have no medical issues) it is due to my eating choices and poor exercise. I am responsible for my actions and would never want to put the blame on my spouse, family members, friends or colleagues. Due to the fact that my locus of control is internal, this will directly affect my leadership style, as well as my responses to others leadership styles.

Having an internal locus of control will directly affect how I lead in any given position. Hypothetically, if I am wanting my company to go from point A to point B, I will want to motivate my team and encourage/help us to get to that point of growth. I believe that we can get there by how I help and support my team. With an internal locus control, I feel that the end result is within my own power of how I lead. This is a byproduct of my somewhat achievement-oriented outlook on leadership. As House describes in his article, “Individuals who are highly achievement motivated are motivated to make accomplishments through their own personal efforts rather than through influencing others or delegation of responsibility for achievement” (House,1996, p. 338). 

While not totally an achievement-oriented leader, I do still value my own input as a main factor in how the goal is achieved. As a subordinate, the Path-Goal Theory is not the leadership style that I respond to best because it is highly individualized leadership style which seems unnecessary to me. Path-Goal Theory is, “… about how leaders motivate followers to accomplish designated goals” (Northouse, 2016, p. 115) but as a subordinate, if the goals are clearly defined I am very self-motivated and do not feel the need for a leader to cater their leadership style directly to me.

While not my preferred leadership method, I do believe that I can and will adapt to the different types of leadership styles with the Path-Goal Theory. Having an internal locus of control, I require little motivation to achieve a goal, I take responsibility for my actions and am driven. This makes me a better team member because I actively take responsibility in my team role and do not expect other members to pick up any of my slack. However, this can impact how I lead others who may not have an internal locus of control as I do. In those situations, I must learn to adapt my leadership style to their personality so that they can feel encouraged and supported in the best possible way to maximize the potential for the team’s success.


References
House, R. J. (1996). Path-goal theory of leadership: Lessons, legacy, and a reformulated theory. The Leadership Quarterly,7(3), 323-352. doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(96)90024-7
Northouse, P. G. (2016). Leadership: Theory and practice. Los Angeles, Calif.: SAGE.
Vandegrift, R., & Matusitz, J. (2011). Path-Goal Theory: A Successful Columbia Records Story. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment,21(4), 350-362. doi:10.1080/10911359.2011.555651



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

MSLD 511 - Module 7 - Inner Work for Authentic Leadership - Madeline Campbell

MSLD520 - Module 2 - 10 Minutes per Day - Madeline Campbell

MSLD520 - Module 5 - What makes us feel good about work? - Madeline Campbell