MGMT 535 - Module 2 - Taking Someone to Lunch - Madeline Campbell
After watching, then reading the
transcript for Elizabeth Lesser’s talk titled Take “The Other” to Lunch, there
is a handful of colleagues that automatically come to mind. Also, there is
automatically a list of people from my workplace that I “click” with more and
know quite-well that I do not need to take to lunch to get to know.
The colleague I would take to lunch
is a newer employee that I know has different views on current issues than I do.
I do not think this is a negative thing, as I believe we can learn a great deal
from individuals who see issues through different lenses than ourselves. This
colleague has a very different personality than me, and one that I struggle to
get to know. In an effort to communicate in an open and honest way, I would set
ground rules much as Lesser did. I would set goals of the following: no
interrupting, listen intently, do not assume, be authentic, be conversational.
One of the advantages of having
open and honest dialogue within the workplace would be what Lesser stated
toward the end of her talk, “And we both
marveled at the labels that fit none of the people we actually
know. And since we had established some trust, we believed in each
other's sincerity” (Lesser, 2010). Communications, as Phillip Clampitt states
“…face a decision between three simple choices: to (1) speak, (2) listen, or
(3) remain silent. Each choice presents us with an unavoidable ethical
decision” (2017, p. 50). Hasty, unrealistic and gossip-like communication can
take place regarding an individual, unless and until you have open and honest
communication with them.
Another advantage of open and
honest communication within the workplace is growth
within a department, or for the organization overall. Clampitt states, “Inevitably,
employees will disagree with an organizational policy, procedure, practice, or
decision. How the organization, managers, and employees deal
with dissent presents an ethical challenge. Employees often hesitate
to share their concerns because they fear possible retaliation... Managers [of]
organizations are often reluctant to encourage dissent because they fear that
it “poisons the atmosphere,”… research shows just the opposite; healthy
constructive debate and dialogue actually build greater commitment to the organization”
(Clampitt, P, 2017, p. 53).
From experience within the workplace, I do believe
that authentic, respectful communication can be fruitful for employee and
manager relationships. If a manager invites open communication, they can foster
a positive work environment vs. an oppressive or autocratic one. Lies, rumors
and gossip easily flood work-environments and this can be corruptive to the
organization. The opposite effect can happen if the manager puts out the flames
of gossip and rumors, is open to hearing from employees and invites honest
communication.
References
Clampitt, P. G. (2017). Communicating for managerial effectiveness: Challenges, strategies, solutions. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Lesser, E. (2010). Transcript of "Take "the Other"
to lunch". Retrieved June 6, 2019, from
https://www.ted.com/talks/elizabeth_lesser_take_the_other_to_lunch/transcript?language=en#t-582684
Comments
Post a Comment