MGMT 535 - Module 9 - Course Reflections - Madeline Campbell
I have always tried to be very careful in how, when, where,
why and who in regards to communicating in a professional environment. Individuals can take something simple you are
asking or saying in a very negative manner if you do not frame the conversation
properly or in a good timeframe. Due to this, this course was very interesting
to me as I had never thoroughly analyzed or dissected communication that occurs
via letter or CMC, etc. I have already and will continue to apply much of what
I have learned in this class as far as communication goes. I want to
continually strive to communicate with my co-workers and managers in an
effective fashion. Module 1 (understanding managerial communication), 4 (communication
technology and group communication), 6 (providing feedback and communicating
about change) and 7 (communicating across organizational boundaries) were all
very eye-opening to me. Clampitt states, “we need to be mindful of how channel
attributes translate into benefits, costs, and value” (2017, p. 99). We use communication daily within the workplace
and therefore I want to ensure that my communication is always benefiting the
people and organization (Koukoumelis, 2012).
There is a mixture of different areas of communication I
want to be more aware of in my day-to-day professional life. One specific area
is how I communicate with other departments here at Embry-Riddle Prescott. Each
department can tend to work in a divided way, however, we are all working
towards the same common goal. There are numerous boundaries that I want to help
eliminate within my communication to make our work more effective. The Pulse Process in chapter 12 of our
textbook, “has three major objectives: (1) identify employee concerns and
reactions to ongoing initiatives in a timely, reliable, and economical manner;
(2) respond to these concerns; and (3) cultivate a productive dialogue between
executives and employees” (Clampitt, 2017, p. 294). The Pulse Process is
something I would like to work on when communicating with others at campus.
Powers states that, “teamwork across organizational boundaries is unnatural” (2012).
This is definitely felt with the current communication patterns, so I would
like to make it feel as natural as possible by communicating in a better format
with other departments. Uri’s TedTalk
about what is happening to the talkers’ and listeners’ brains was also very interesting
and something I know I am going to actively think about when communicating with
others, as well as the fact that “communication relies on common ground”
(2016). Each individual has to communicate in one medium or another.
References
Clampitt, P. G. (2017).
Communicating for managerial effectiveness: Challenges, strategies, solutions.
Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Koukoumelis, A., Levati, M. V.,
& Weisser, J. (2012). Leading by words: A voluntary contribution
experiment with one-way communication. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 81(2),
379-390. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2011.11.007
experiment with one-way communication. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 81(2),
379-390. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2011.11.007
Power, B. (2012). Get your team to
work across organizational boundaries. Retrieved from
https://hbr.org/2012/04/building-a-team-across-organi
https://hbr.org/2012/04/building-a-team-across-organi
Hasson, U. (2016). Transcript of
"This is your brain on communication". Retrieved July 23, 2019, from
https://www.ted.com/talks/uri_hasson_this_is_your_brain_on_communication/transcript?language=en#t-764711
Comments
Post a Comment