MSLD520 - Module 3 - Constraints on Problem Solving - Madeline Campbell
Common
restraints that I have placed on myself within my workplace are self-doubt and
apathy. Examples of self-doubt would be questioning myself on a specific work
procedure or information I share with a potential student or holding back an
idea I have during a team meeting. Throughout my last year and a half in the
admission department, I am aware that I am sharing the correct answers to
common questions and how to complete my work tasks throughout the day. My two
managers have informed me that they believe I have excelled greatly and am one
of their strongest counselors, however I continue to doubt and question
throughout the entire day. The second constraint, apathy; often when work is
slow, or I feel as though I am not flourishing within my office, I am
unmotivated to complete the simplest office tasks. These are two common
restraints that I know I need to destroy in order to engage in problem solving
with my team and individually.
The
constraint of apathy has prevented me in numerous places within my workplace to
engage in problem solving as I am unmotivated and unencouraged to work hard to
figure out the issue, as well as the root of the issue. Whetton and Cameron
refer to complacency as, “conceptual blocks [that] occur not because of poor
thinking habits or inappropriate assumptions but because of fear, ignorance,
insecurity or just plain mental laziness” (2016, p.155). I do not think my
constraint of apathy stems from laziness or ignorance, but rather from
frustrations with workplace problems. Seeing issues arise and not being handled
professionally has made me demotivated to work hard. There are new tactics I am
attempting to implement in order to prevent demotivation within my workplace
from reoccurring. Creative problem solving has and will continue to highly
benefit me with this constraint. Within our lecture, our professor stated that,
“1. Incubation-fostering ideas of generation-work together to come up with new
ideas 2. Imagination-creation of new ideas 3. Improvement-change the improve
something that already exists 4. Investment – rapid results.” Mixing this with
analytical problem solving will greatly improve my motivation in the workplace.
Whetton and Cameron emphasize the mixture of different problem solving as they
state, “It is important to point out that no one approach to creativity is
best. Different circumstances call for different approaches” (2016, p. 147).
I would like to take on a leadership
role in the future, so honing
problem-solving skills now is something I am actively working on. I would like
to encourage a team to problem solve in order to find a solution to a current work-related
problem. Saleh discusses creative problem solving and how, “Frequently,
creative teams are known to reframe original problems and even to set aside the creativity task and
forget about it for a while to circumvent mental blocks and find new approaches”
(2015, p. 9). I know that once I overcome the lack of motivation to excel and
the lack of self-confidence I will begin to be more creative and productive in
the workplace.
References
Whetton, D. A. &
Cameron, K. S. (2016). Developing management skills,
9th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson.
9th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson.
Saleh, S.
H. (2015). Freedom from freedom: The beneficial role of constraints in
collaborative creativity (Doctoral
dissertation, University of Colorado). Read the second paper entitled: How
Do Entrepreneurs Make Decisions That Require Creativity: Re-evaluating the
role of heuristics and biases.
Comments
Post a Comment